Factors Influencing the Boycott Intentions of Turkish Consumers amid the Israel-Palestine Conflict
PDF

Keywords

boycott intention
perceived efficacy
social pressure
social media
discount sensitivity

How to Cite

Avcı, İbrahim. (2024). Factors Influencing the Boycott Intentions of Turkish Consumers amid the Israel-Palestine Conflict. Review of Business Management, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v26i4.4282

Abstract

Purpose – The goal of the research is to determine the perceived efficacy of brand boycotting campaigns by Turkish consumers, as well as the effects of social pressure on boycott intention, the mediating role of social media, and the moderating role of discount sensitivity on these effects. 

Theoretical framework – The research idea and model were developed following previous boycott research (Shin and Yoon, 2018; Muhamad et al., 2018; Asnawi et al., 2019; Zhai and Luo, 2023). 

Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from Turkish consumers using the convenience sampling method and an online survey. Using data from 417 consumers, the research hypotheses were investigated using structural equation modeling. 

Findings – According to the findings, perceived efficacy and social pressure have a significant effect on consumers' boycott intentions, with social media playing a partial mediating role. Furthermore, consumers' sensitivity to discounts offered by boycotted firms was found to have a moderating effect on the relationship between social pressure and boycott intention. 

Practical & social implications of research – Managers of boycotted brands should devise appropriate marketing strategies to minimize damage. Given the importance of social media in boycotts, it is imperative that brands actively use social media as a communication channel. 

Originality/value – The fact that the paper examines the idea of boycotting in the context of both social media and consumer discount sensitivity demonstrates the importance of the research and its contribution to filling a gap in the literature. 

https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v26i4.4282
PDF

References

Abosag, I. (2010). Dancing with macro-boycotters: the case of Arla food. Journal of Marketing Planning and Intelligence, 28(3), 365-373.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Arafat, S. M., Ahmad, A. R., Murad, H. R., & Kakashekh, H. M. (2021). Perceived impact of social media on panic buying: An online cross-sectional survey in Iraqi Kurdistan. Frontiers in public health, 9, 447.

Asnawi, N., Nina D., & Muhammad., D (2019). Predicting muslim consumer intention to boycott a product - a test of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(2), 1534-1550.

Aydın, G. (2021). Consumer cynicism, skepticism, brand boycotts and social media” ed. Bingol, u., trending topics on social media researches, Peter Lang, DOI 10.3726/b18979: 61-90.

Bagozzi, R. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sciences, 16, 74-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

Balıkçıoğlu, B., Koçak, A., & Özer, A. (2007). Şiddet içermeyen bir eylem olarak dolaylı tüketici boykotlarının oluşum süreci ve türkiye için değerlendirme. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 62(03), 79-100. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002034

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Brady, S. A., Young, J. A., & McLeod, D. A. (2015). Utilizing digital advocacy in community organizing: Lessons learned from organizing in virtual spaces to promote worker rights and economic justice. Journal of Community Practice, 23(2), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2015.1027803

Braunsberger, K., & Buckler, B. (2011). What motivates consumers to participate in boycotts: Lessons from the ongoing Canadian seafood boycott. Journal of Business Research, 64(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.008

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Chiu, H. K. (2016). Exploring the factors affecting consumer boycott behaviour in Taiwan: Food oil incidents and the resulting crisis of Brand Trust. International Journal of Business and Information, 11(1), 49.

Cruz, B. P. A., Pires, R. J. M., Jr., & Ross, S. D. (2013). Gender difference in the perception of guilt in consumer boycott. Review of Business Management, 15(49), 504–523.

Dalakas, V., Melancon, J.P. & Szczytynski, I. (2023). Brands in the eye of the storm: navigating political consumerism and boycott calls on social media. Qualitative Market Research, 26(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-07-2021-0089

Delistavrou, A., Krystallis, A. & Tilikidou, I. (2020). Consumer’s decision to boycott ‘unethical’ products: the role of materialism/post materialism. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 48(10), 1121-1138, doi: 10.1108/IJRDM-04-2019-0126.

Edrington, C. L., & Lee, N. (2018). Tweeting a social movement: Black Lives Matter and its use of Twitter to share information, build community, and promote action. The Journal of Public Interest Communications, 2(2), 289. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v2.i2.p289

Keser, E. & Söğütlü, R. (2023). Investigation of the mediating role of consumer boycott participation motives in the effect of consumer cynicism on consumer boycott behavior. Curr Res Soc Sci, 9(1), 69-91.

Ettenson, R. & Klein, J. (2005). The fallout from French nuclear testing in the South Pacific: a longitudinal] research of consumer boycott. International Marketing Review, 22(2), 199-224.

Park, E.A. & Park, M. (2018). Who participate in a boycott?: A research of antecedents about boycott participation intention. The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology 19(1), 121–38. https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2018.19.1.121 .

Farah, M.F. & Newman, A.J. (2010). Exploring consumer boycott ıntelligence using a socio-cognitive approach. Journal of Business Research, 63(4), 347–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.019 .

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

Friedman, M. (1999). Consumer boycotts, Routledge, New York, NY.

Fujita, M., Harrigan, P.& Soutar, G. N. (2018). Capturing and co-creating student experiences in social media: a social ıdentity theory perspective. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 26(1-2), 55-71.

George, D. & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference 17.0 Update. 10th Edition, Pearson, Boston

Grzegorz, Z. (2019). The role of ındividual- and contextual-level social capital in product boycotting: a multilevel analysis. Sustainability, 11, 949. doi:10.3390/su11040949.

Gutierrez Florez, L. E., Correa Escobar, M. I., Henao Restrepo, A., Arango Botero, D., & Valencia Arias, A. (2017). Influence of social networks on the purchase decisions of university students. Cuadernos de Gestión, 18(1), 61-84

Gürbüz, S. (2019). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi temel ilkeler ve uygulamalı analizler (IBM AMOS uygulamalı, örnek veri setleri). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. 7th Edition, Pearson, New York.

Hendel, I., Lach, S. & Spiegel, Y. (2017). Consumer's activism: The cottage cheese boycott. RAND Journal of Economics, 48(4), 972–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12212

Hoşgör, H. K. & Sezgin, M. (2024). İsrail menşeli ürün ve hizmetlere yönelik e-boykot söylemlerinin çevrimiçi bir şikâyet portalı üzerinden incelenmesi. R&S - Research Studies Anatolia Journal, 7(1), 97-122. https://doi.org/10.33723/rs.1411345

Buran, İ., Sabah Çelik, Ş. & Koçak, A. (2021). Kadın kadındır, çiçek babandır: Feminist kolektif eylem ve sosyal medya katılımı ilişkisi," 25. PPAD Pazarlama Kongresi, Ankara, Turkey.

Jensen, H.R. (2008). The Mohammed cartoons controversy and the boycott of Danish products in the Middle East. European Business Review, 20(3), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340810871455.

John, A. & Klein, J. (2003). The boycott puzzle: consumer motivations for purchase sacrifice. Management Science, 49(9), 1196-1209. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.9.1196.16569.

Joreskog, K. G. & Sorbom, D. (1984). Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Kam, C.D. & Deichert, M. (2019). Boycotting, buycotting, and the psychology of political consumerism. The Journal of Politics, 82(1), 72-88.

Kanol, D., & Nat, M. (2017). Interest groups and social media: An examination of cause and sectional groups' social media strategies in the EU. Journal of Public Affairs, 17(3), e1649. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1649

Klein, J., Ettenson, R. & Morris, M. (1998). The animosity model of foreign product purchase: an empirical test in the people’s republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 89-100.

Klein, J.G., Smith, N.C. & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92–109.

Lee, J. (2020). Boycotting in the age of social media: the case of #NoJapan movement in South Korea, Uppsala University, Master’s Programme in Social Sciences, Digital Media and Society specialization Two-year Master’s Thesis.

Makarem, S.C. & Jae, H. (2016). Consumer boycott behavior: an exploratory analysis of twitter feeds. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 50(1). 193–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12080 .

Özer, M., Özer, A. & Koçak, A. (2022) Comparing the antecedents of boycotts and buycotts: mediating role of self-esteem on subjective well-being and the moderating effects of materialism. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(17-18), 1873-1906, https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2065334

Mrad, S. B., Sheng, S. Y., & Hart, L. K. (2013). Do rumblings lead to real action? A case of animosity and boycott in China. International Journal of China Marketing, 3(2), 35–48.

Muhamad, N., Khamarudin, M., & Fauzi, W. I. M. (2018). The role of religious motivation in an international consumer boycott. British Food Journal, 121(1), 199-217.

Öztürk, A., & Nart, S. (2021). Tüketici boykot davranışının belirleyicileri üzerine bir araştırma: ağızdan ağıza iletişimin aracılık rolü. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(78), 660-687. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.784595

Pandey, S. P., Ahmad, Y., & Gautam, A. (2021). Consumer motivations for boycott. Pacific Business Review, 14(6), 51-63.

Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2010). The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 443-471.

Pekkala, K., & Van Zoonen, W. (2022). Work-related social media use : the mediating role of social media communication self-efficacy. European Management Journal, 40(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2021.03.004

Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

Salma, S. Y., & Aji, H. M. (2023). What drives Muslims to boycott French brands? The moderating role of brand judgement and counterargument. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 14(5), 1346-1368.

Sari, D.K., Mizerski, D. &Liu, F. (2017). Boycotting foreign products: a research of Indonesian Muslim consumers. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2014-0078.

Sen, S., Gurhan-Canli, Z. & Morwitz, V. (2001). Withholding consumption: a social dilemma perspective on consumer boycotts. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 399-417.

Sezgin, M., & Altay, I. (2021). Üniversite tercihinde sosyal medyanın aracı rolü. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Ve Eğitim Dergisi, 3(4), 87-104.

Shin, S., & Yoon, S. W. (2018). Consumer motivation for the decision to boycott: The social dilemma. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(4), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12444

Stieger, S., & Lewetz, D. (2018). A week without using social media: Results from an ecological momentary intervention research using smartphones. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(10), 618-624.

Xie, J., Choo, H.J. & Lee, H.K. (2023). Effects of consumer animosity on boycotts: the role of cognitive-affective evaluations and xenocentrism. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 28(1),-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-11-2022-0235

Yavuz, N., & Sağlam, M. (2018). İşkoliklik ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkide iş yaşam dengesinin aracılık rolü. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(4), 922-952.

Yılmaz, V. & Dalbudak, Z. İ. (2018). Aracı değişken etkisinin incelenmesi: yüksek hızlı tren işletmeciliği üzerine bir uygulama. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat Ve İşletme Dergisi, 14(2), 517-534. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2018239946

Zhai, X., & Luo, Q. (2023). Rational or emotional? A research on Chinese tourism boycotts on social media during international crisis situations. Tourism Management Perspectives, 45, 101069.

Zhang, X. (2020). An exploratory study: Understanding consumerism of consumer boycott and consumer buycott. (Unpublished Master's thesis), The University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

If a paper is approved for publication, its copyright has to be transferred by the author(s) to the Review of Business Management – RBGN.

Accordingly, authors are REQUIRED to send RBGN a duly completed and signed Copyright Transfer Form. Please refer to the following template: [Copyright Transfer]

The conditions set out by the Copyright Transfer Form state that the Review of Business Management – RBGN owns, free of charge and permanently, the copyright of the papers it publishes. Although the authors are required to sign the Copyright Transfer Form, RBGN allows authors to hold and use their own copyright without restrictions.

The texts published by RBGN are the sole responsibility of their authors.

The review has adopted the CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allowing redistribution and reuse of papers on condition that the authorship is properly credited.