Keywords
Sustainability
Human Resources Management Practices
Armed Forces
How to Cite
Abstract
Purpose – This paper develops a case study focused on the Portuguese Air Force, aiming first to identify the Internal Audit (IA) roles and then analyse its influence on organisation sustainability while exploring the moderating effect of human resources management practices (HRMP).
Theoretical framework – This research draws on the empirical work regarding the roles and activities performed by IA in the private sector and human capital theory to assess the effect of HRMP on performance.
Design/methodology/approach – The study uses the survey method and data were collected through a questionnaire made available on an electronic platform. This study applies ordinary least squares regression model.
Findings – This study shows that IA provides assurance and consulting services and IA is positively related to sustainability orientation, particularly in the governance and social dimensions. The moderating effect of HRMP is only felt in the environmental dimension.
Research Practical & Social implications – This study reinforces the literature regarding the relationship between IA effectiveness and sustainability, provides insight into the IA effectiveness reported by the auditors themselves, identifies the portfolio of functions performed by IA and points to improvements to be made in IA management.
Originality/value – The topics studied are for the first time explored in the context of the armed forces and is pioneering in analysing the moderating effect of HMRP on the relationship between IA and sustainability.
Keywords – Internal audit, Sustainability, Human Resources Management Practices, Armed Forces.
References
Ahmad, N., Othman, R., Othman, R., & Jusoff, K. (2009). The effectiveness of internal audit in Malaysian public sector. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 5 (9), 53.
Albrecht, S. L., Gruman, A. B., Jamie A, Saks, W. H., & Alan. (2015). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness, 2 (1), 7-35.
Alkafaji, Y., Hussain, S., Khallaf, A., & Majdalawieh, M. A. (2011). The IIA’s global internal audit survey: a component of the CBOK study. Characteristics of an Internal Audit Activity Report I. Altamonte Springs, FL, USA: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.
Al-Twaijry, A. A., Brierley, J. A., & Gwilliam, D. R. (2003). The development of internal audit in Saudi Arabia: an institutional theory perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14 (5), 507-531.
Alzeban, A., & Gwilliam, D. (2014). Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: A survey of the Saudi public sector. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23 (2), 74-86.
Anderson, U. L., Head, M. J., Ramamoorti, S., Riddle, C., Salamasick, M., & Sobel, P. J. (2017). Internal auditing: Assurance & advisory services (4th ed.). Canada: Internal Audit Foundation.
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14 (3), 396-402.
Asare, T. (2009). Internal auditing in the public sector: Promoting good governance and performance improvement. International Journal on Governmental Financial Management, 9 (1), 15-28.
Barišić, I., & Tušek, B. (2016). The importance of the supportive control environment for internal audit effectiveness - The case of Croatian companies. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 29 (1), 1021-1037.
Becker, G. S. (Gary S. (2009). Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cohen, A., & Sayag, G. (2010). The Effectiveness of Internal Auditing: An Empirical Examination of its Determinants in Israeli Organisations. Australian Accounting Review, 20 (3), 296-307.
Cohen, J. R., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. (2004). The corporate governance mosaic and financial reporting quality. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, 87-152.
Decreto-lei n.º 187/2014 de 29 de dezembro. Lei orgânica da Força Aérea. Diário da República Série I.
Decreto-Regulamentar n.º 12/2015 de 31 de julho. Diário da República Série I.
DeSimone, S., D’Onza, G., & Sarens, G. (2020). Correlates of internal audit function involvement in sustainability audits. Journal of Management and Governance, 25 (2), 561-591.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks (1st ed.). United Kingdom: Capstone Publishing Limited.
Eisenberg, D. A., Alderson, D. L., Kitsak, M., Ganin, A. & Linkov, I. (2018). Network Foundation for Command and Control (C2) Systems: Literature Review. IEEE Access, 6, 68782–68794.
Eulerich, A., & Eulerich, M. (2020). What is the value of internal auditing? – A literature review on qualitative and quantitative perspectives. Maandblad Voor Accountancy En Bedrijfseconomie, 94 (3-4), 83-92.
Eulerich, M., & Lenz, R. (2020). Defining, Measuring, and Communicating the Value of Internal Audit Best. Practices for the Profession. Dallas: Internal Audit Foundation.
Evans, R. and Davis, W. (2005). High-performance work systems and organizational performance: the mediating role of internal social structure. Journal of Management, 31 (5), 758-775.
Felício, T., Samagaio, A. & Rodrigues, R. (2021). Adoption of management control systems and performance in public sector organizations. Journal of Business Research, 124 (2021), 593–602.
Força Aérea (1999). RFA 305-1 (B). Regulamento da Organização das Bases Aéreas. Alfragide: Força Aérea.
Força Aérea (2011). RFA 303-3 (A) Organização e normas de funcionamento da Inspecção-Geral da Força Aérea. Alfragide: Força Aérea.
Força Aérea (2012). MCLAFA 305-4. Organização e normas de funcionamento da Direção de Engenharia e Programas. Alfragide: Força Aérea.
Força Aérea (2013). RFA 303-10 (A). Organização e normas de funcionamento da Direção de Finanças da Força Aérea. Alfragide: Força Aérea.
Godinho, L. M. M. (2023). Management control systems use in military defense organizations: a levers of control analysis of the Portuguese Armed Forces. Unpublished thesis (PhD.), Universidade de Lisboa.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Black, W. C., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). China: Cengage Learning.
Harasheh, M., & Provasi, R. (2022). A need for assurance: Do internal control systems integrate environmental, social, and governance factors?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30 (1), 384-401.
Hazaea, S. A., Zhu, J., Khatib, S. F., Bazhair, A. H., & Elamer, A. A. (2021). Sustainability assurance practices: A systematic review and future research agenda. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (4), 4843-4864.
Hazaea, S. A., Zhu, J., Khatib, S. F., & Elamer, A. A. (2022). Mapping the literature of internal auditing in Europe: a systematic review and agenda for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, (ahead-of-print).
Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2020). Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 45 (1), 3-14.
Kautonen, T., Schillebeeckx, S. J., Gartner, J., Hakala, H., Salmela- Aro, K., & Snellman, K. (2021). The dark side of sustainability orientation for SME performance. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 14, e00198.
Lenz, R., Sarens, G., & Jeppesen, K. K. (2018). In search of a measure of effectiveness for internal audit functions: an institutional perspective. Edpacs, 58 (2), 1-36.
Leung, P., Cooper, B. J., & Robertson, P. T. (2003). The role of internal audit in corporate governance & management. Australia: School of Accounting and Law, RMIT University.
Lin, S., Pizzini, M., Vargus, M., & Bardhan, I. R. (2011). The role of the internal audit function in the disclosure of material weaknesses. Accounting Review, 86 (1), 287-323.
Marôco, J. (2021). Análise Estatística com o SPSS Statistics. 8 ed. ReportNumber, Lda.
Mathis, R. L., Jackson, J. H., Valentine, S. R., & Meglich, P. A. (2017). Human Resource Management (15th ed.). USA: Cengage Learning.
Mihret, D. G., & Yismaw, A. W. (2007). Internal audit effectiveness: An Ethiopian public sector case study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22 (5), 470-484.
Naciti, V., Cesaroni, F., & Pulejo, L. (2021). Corporate governance and sustainability: A review of the existing literature. Journal of Management and Governance, 26, 55-74.
Onumah, J. M., & Krah, R. Y. (2012). Barriers and catalysts to effective internal audit in the Ghanaian public sector. Accounting in Africa, 12, 177-207.
Pickett, K. S. (2010). The internal auditing handbook (3rd ed.). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
Piper, A. (2015). Auditing the Public Sector: Managing Expectations, Delivering Results. The Global Internal Audit Common Body of Knowledge (CBOK). Altamonte Springs, FL, USA: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.
Prawitt, D. F., Smith, J. L., & Wood, D. A. (2009). Internal audit quality and earnings management. Accounting Review, 84 (4), 1255-1280.
Moeller, R. (2016). Brink’s modern internal auditing: a common body of knowledge (8th ed.). USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Utsch, A. (2005). Effects of human capital and long–term human resources development and utilization on employment growth of small–scale businesses: A causal analysis. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 29 (6), 681-698.
Rensburg, J. O., & Coetzee, P. (2016). Internal audit public sector capability: A case study. Journal of Public Affairs, 16 (2), 181–191.
Roberts, S., Ogunnaike, O., Uwasomba, M., Wong, S., & Anne, M. (2022). Prioritizing Environmental, Social, and Governance. Exploring Internal Audit’s Role as a Critical Collaborator. Lake Mary, FL, USA: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation.
Roussy, M. (2013). Internal auditors’ roles: From watchdogs to helpers and protectors of the top manager. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24 (7–8), 550-571.
Roussy, M., & Brivot, M. (2016). Internal audit quality: a polysemous notion?. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29 (5), 714-738.
Roussy, M., & Perron, A. (2018). New Perspectives in Internal Audit Research: A Structured Literature Review. Accounting Perspectives, 17 (3), 345-385.
Salvada, P. (2018). Melhoria Contínua de Processos das Forças Armadas. Lisboa, Instituto Universitário Militar.
Samagaio, A., & Diogo, T. A. (2022). Effect of Computer Assisted Audit Tools on Corporate Sustainability. Sustainability, 14 (2), 705.
Soh, D. S. B., & Martinov-Bennie, N. (2018). Factors associated with internal audit’s involvement in environmental and social assurance and consulting. International Journal of Auditing, 22 (3), 404-421.
Soh, D. S.B., & Martinov-Bennie, N. (2015). Internal auditors’ perceptions of their role in environmental, social and governance assurance and consulting. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30 (1), 80-111.
Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (2001). Cut your risks with environmental auditing. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 12 (4), 11-14.
Tang, G., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Paillé, P., & Jia, J. (2018). Green human resource management practices: scale development and validity. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 56 (1), 31-55.
The Institute of Internal Auditors (2017). International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. Make Lary, FL, USA: The Institute of Internal Auditors.
The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation (2015). CBOK 2015 Global Internal Audit Practitioner Survey. Lake Mary, FL, USA: The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. Available from: https://www.theiia.org/globalassets/site/foundation/author-resources/cbok-2015-practitioner-survey-question-list.xlsx
The Institute of Internal Auditors. (2013). The three lines of defense in effective risk management and control. Florida: The Institute of Internal Auditors.
The Institute of Internal Auditors. (2021). Internal audit’s role in ESG reporting. Independent assurance is critical to effective sustainability reporting. United States of America: The Institute of Internal Auditors.
The Institute of Internal Auditors. (2021). On Risk Report - A guide to understanding, aligning, and optimizating risk 2022. Lake Mary, FL, USA: The Institute of Internal Auditors.
Tompkins, J. R. (2023). Organization theory and public management. Waveland Press.
Trotman, A. J., & Duncan, K. R. (2018). Internal audit quality: Insights from audit committee members, senior management, and internal auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37 (4), 235-259.
Turetken, O., Jethefer, S., & Ozkan, B. (2020). Internal audit effectiveness: operationalization and influencing factors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35 (2), 238-271.
Vadasi, C., Bekiaris, M., & Andrikopoulos, A. (2019). Corporate governance and internal audit: an institutional theory perspective. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20 (1), 175-190.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development & The Institute of Internal Auditors (WBCSD & IIA). (2022). Embedding ESG and sustainability considerations into the Three Lines Model. Available from: https://www.theiia.org/globalassets/site/content/tools/advocacy/2022/embedding-esg-and-sustainability-considerations-into-the-three-lines-model/embedding-esg-and-sustainability-considerations-into-the-3-lines-model.pdf
If a paper is approved for publication, its copyright has to be transferred by the author(s) to the Review of Business Management – RBGN.
Accordingly, authors are REQUIRED to send RBGN a duly completed and signed Copyright Transfer Form. Please refer to the following template: [Copyright Transfer]
The conditions set out by the Copyright Transfer Form state that the Review of Business Management – RBGN owns, free of charge and permanently, the copyright of the papers it publishes. Although the authors are required to sign the Copyright Transfer Form, RBGN allows authors to hold and use their own copyright without restrictions.
The texts published by RBGN are the sole responsibility of their authors.
The review has adopted the CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allowing redistribution and reuse of papers on condition that the authorship is properly credited.