Keywords
Board of Directors
Corporate Governance
Financial Performance
Brazil
How to Cite
Abstract
Purpose – This study investigates how different dimensions of board diversity influence the financial performance of non-financial Brazilian companies, focusing on Brazil’s institutional and cultural specificities.
Theoretical framework – The theoretical framework combines Resource Dependence Theory (RDT), Agency Theory, and Upper Echelons Theory, emphasizing mechanisms through which board diversity may affect organizational performance.
Design/methodology/approach – This is an empirical, longitudinal study analyzing data from 367 companies listed on B3 between 2011 and 2021. Panel data regression models with fixed effects were applied, with diversity variables constructed from indices such as Blau's, in addition to dummy variables.
Findings – The results indicate statistically significant associations between some dimensions of diversity and financial performance, highlighting the positive impact of academic background diversity and previous board experience, as well as negative effects associated with female participation and positive effects from family ties.
Research Practical & Social implications – This research offers important recommendations for improving governance practices in Brazil, suggesting that diversity should be promoted strategically and effectively, overcoming tokenism and aligning with national contextual specificities.
Originality/value – The study contributes to the literature by conducting a comprehensive analysis of board diversity in Brazil, incorporating multiple dimensions beyond gender, such as academic background, experience, independence, and family ties, based on an unprecedented dataset for the country.
References
ABMES (2022). Classificação de cursos de graduação por área de conhecimento. Disponível em: https://abmes.org.br/classificacao-de-cursos#. Acesso em: 10 nov. 2022.
ALABEDE, J. (2016). Effect of Board Diversity on Corporate Governance Structure and Operating Performance: Evidence from the UK Listed Firms. Asian Journal of Accounting & Governance, 7.
ANDERSON, R. C., REEB, D. M., UPADHYAY, A., & ZHAO, W. (2011). The economics of director heterogeneity. Financial Management, 40(1), 5-38.
BALSMEIER, B.; BUCHWALD, A.; STIEBALE, J. (2014) Outside directors on the board and innovative firm performance. Research Policy, v. 43, n. 10, p. 1800-1815. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.003.
BEREZINETS, I.; BEREZKIN, K.; ILINA, Y.; NAOUMOVA, I. (2019). Board of Directors as a Factor of Firm Performance in Innovative Companies. International Journal of Innovation Management, v. 23, n. 6, p. 1-16. DOI 10.1142/S1363919619500609. Disponível em: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/S1363919619500609. Acesso em: 8 dez. 2022.
BERKELEY. What Is Diversity? (2022). Disponível em: https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/topic/diversity/definition. Acesso em: 10 dez. 2022.
BERGH, D. D.; POWELL, R.; ZHAO, Y. (2024). Another look at the managerial entrenchment hypothesis of acquisitions: A replication of Humphery-Jenner (2014). Journal of Management Scientific Reports. Disponível em: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/27550311231222555. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2024.
BETTIS, R. A.; HELFAT, C. E.; SHAVER, J. M. (2016) The necessity, logic, and forms of replication. Strategic Management Journal, v. 37, n. 11, p. 2193-2203. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/smj.2580. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2024.
BEZUIDENHOUT, H.; MHONYERA, G.; VAN RENSBURG, J.; SHENG, H. H., CARRERA JR, J. M.; CUI, X. (2021). Emerging market global players: the case of Brazil, China and South Africa. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 21, p. 12234.
COSTA, L.; SAMPAIO, J.O.; FLORES, E. S. (2019). Gender Diversity in Board of Directors and the Relationship between Performance and Financial Risk in Family Firms. RAC-Revista de Administracao Contemporanea, 23(6), 721-738.
DAVIS, J. H.; SCHOORMAN, F. D.; DONALDSON, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20-47.
DREES, J. M.; HEUGENS, P. P. Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, v. 39, n. 6, p. 1666–1698, 2013.
EDEN, D. (2002). From the editors: Replication, meta-analysis, scientific progress, and AMJ’s publication policy. The Academy of Management Journal, v. 45, n. 5, p. 841-846. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3069317. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2024.
EZEANI, E.; KWABI, F.; SALEM, R.; USMAN, M.; ALQATAMIN, R. M. H.; KOSTOV, P. (2023). Corporate board and dynamics of capital structure: evidence from UK, France and Germany. International Journal of Finance & Economics, p. 1-18. DOI 10.1002/ijfe.2593.
ETHIRAJ, S. K.; GAMBARDELLA, A.; HELFAT, C. E. (2016). Replication in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, v. 37, n. 11, p. 2191-2192. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/smj.2581. Acesso em: 02 dez. 2024
FRICK, B.; BERMIG, A. (2009). Board size, board composition and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Germany. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 5(2), 178-210. Acesso em: 02 out. 2022.
GRANT, B. J. (2017) Tokenism. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Political Behavior.
GREENE, W. H. Econometric analysis. 6. ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2007.
HAMBRICK, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, v. 32, n. 2, p. 334–343.
HEARN, B. (2015). Institutional influences on board composition of international joint venture firms listing on emerging stock exchanges: Evidence from Africa. Journal of World Business, 50(1), 205-219.
KHAN, H. U. R., KHIDMAT, W. B., Habib, M. D., & Awan, S. (2022). Academic directors in board and corporate expropriation: Evidence from China. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(2), 372-397.
KOUTOUPIS, A.; SKOURTI, T.; DAVIDOPOULOS, L. G.; KAMPOURIS, C. G. (2022). Board diversity: current state and future avenues. Theoretical Economics Letters, 12(3), 788-813.
JABBOUR, C. J. C.; GORDONO, F. S.; OLIVEIRA, J. H. C. D.; MARTINEZ, J. C.; BATTISTELLE, R. A. G. (2011). Diversity management: challenges, benefits, and the role of human resource management in Brazilian organizations. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 30(1), 58-74.
JIANG, H.; LUO, Y.; XIA, J.; HITT, M.; SHEN, J. (2023). Resource dependence theory in international business: Progress and prospects. Global Strategy Journal, v. 13, n. 1, p. 3–57.
MENSA, M.; MUELLER, S. (2024). More than you see: lack of diversity in Brazilian creative departments. Journal of Gender Studies, v. 33, n. 8, p. 991-1009.
MESNIK, S. (2018). A relação de independência do Conselho de Administração com o desempenho financeiro das empresas de capital aberto no Brasil. 2018. Dissertação (Mestrado em Economia) – Escola de Economia de São Paulo – Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo.
MGAMMAL, M. H. (2022). Appraisal study on board diversity: Review and agenda for future research. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2121241.
NISIYAMA, E. K.; NAKAMURA, W T. (2018). Diversidade do conselho de administração e a estrutura de capital. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 58, n. 6, p. 551-563. DOI 10.1590/S0034-759020180604. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/rae/a/khm9KbhLsFGJgVvQfmG8StK/abstract/?lang=pt. Acesso em: 15 dez. 2022.
PAINE, L. S.; SRINICASAN, S. A. (2019). A Guide to the Big Ideas and Debates in Corporate Governance. Harvard Business Review, 2, p. 19. Disponível em: https://hbr.org/2019/10/a-guide-to-the-big-ideas-and-debates-in-corporate-governance?language=pt. Acesso em: 25 out. 2022.
PARENTE, T. C.; MACHADO FILHO, C. A. (2020). Conselhos de administração no Brasil: Revisão da literatura e agenda de pesquisa. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 21, eRAMD200066.
RANASINGHE, D., UNDA, L. A.; WRIGHT, S. (2024). Do women mind the non-GAAP? Board gender diversity and non-GAAP disclosure quality. European Accounting Review, 33(3), 713-739.
RASHID, A.; DE ZOYSA, A.; LODH, S.; RUDKIN, K. (2010). Board composition and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 4(1).
RODRIGUES, L. L. (2020). Diversidade de gênero no conselho e sua relação com resultados financeiros e transparência. Dissertação (mestrado profissional MPGC) – Fundação Getúlio Vargas, São Paulo. Disponível em: encr.pw/MpD2r. Acesso em: 28 nov. 2022.
ROSSIGNOLI, F.; LIONZO, A.; BUCHETTI, B. (2021). Beyond corporate governance reporting: the usefulness of information on board member profiles. Journal of Management & Governance, v. 25, n. 1, p. 27-60. DOI: 10.1007/s10997-020-09502-4. Acesso em: 10 dez. 2023.
SHAPIRO, S. P. (2005). Agency theory. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 31(1), 263-284.
SINGH, G.; DWESAR, R. (2022). Board gender diversity, firm performance and firm risk: a literature survey. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 11(3), 69-84.
SOARE, T. M.; DETILLEUX, C.; DESCHACHT, N. (2022). The impact of the gender composition of company boards on firm performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, v. 71, n. 5, p. 1611-1624. DOI 10.1108/IJPPM-02-2020-0073.
SPENCERSTUART (2020). Brazil Spencer Stuart Board Index. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.spencerstuart.com/research-and-insight/brasil-board-index. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2022.
SPENCERSTUART (2021a). Hong Kong Spencer Stuart Board Index. 2021a. Disponível em: https://www.spencerstuart.com/research-and-insight/hong-kong-board-index. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2022.
SPENCERSTUART (2021b). Switzerland Spencer Stuart Board Index. 2021b. Disponível em: https://www.spencerstuart.com/research-and-insight/switzerland-board-index. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2022.
SPENCERSTUART (2022). Brazil Spencer Stuart Board Index. 2022. Disponível em: https://www.spencerstuart.com. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2025.
SPENCERSTUART (2022a). UK Spencer Stuart Board Index. 2022a. Disponível em: https://www.spencerstuart.com/research-and-insight/uk-board-index. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2022.
SPENCERSTUART (2022b). U.S. Spencer Stuart Board Index. 2022b. Disponível em: https://www.spencerstuart.com/research-and-insight/us-board-index. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2022.
SPIERINGS, M. (2022). Board composition: diversity, experience, and effectiveness. Disponível em: https://www.conference-board.org/topics/board-practices-compensation/diversity-experience-and-effectiveness. Acesso em: 04 dez. 2022.
TALJAARD, C; WARD, M.; MULLER, C. (2015). Board diversity and financial performance: A graphical time-series approach. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, v. 18, n. 3, p. 425-447.
UPADHYAY, A.; TRIANA, M. C. (2021) Drivers of diversity on boards: the impact of the Sarbanes‐Oxley act. Human Resource Management, [v. 60, n. 4, p. 517-534. DOI 10.1002/hrm.22035. Acesso em: 28 out. 2022.
WANG, Y.; OLIVER J. (2009). Board composition and firm performance variance: Australian evidence. Accounting Research Journal, v. 22, n. 2, p. 196-212. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/10309610910987510. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2022.
WILLIAMSON, O. E. (1993). Opportunism and its critics. Managerial and decision economics, 97-107.
XIE, X.; O’NEILL, H. (2013). Boards as resource providers and monitors for research and development. Journal of Business Strategies, v. 30, n. 2, p. 180-204. DOI https://doi.org/10.54155/jbs.30.2.180-204. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2020.
YANG, P.; RIEPE, J.; MOSER, K.; PULL, K.; TERJESEN, S. (2019). Women directors, firm performance, and firm risk: A causal perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(5), 101297.
If a paper is approved for publication, its copyright has to be transferred by the author(s) to the Review of Business Management – RBGN.
Accordingly, authors are REQUIRED to send RBGN a duly completed and signed Copyright Transfer Form. Please refer to the following template: [Copyright Transfer]
The conditions set out by the Copyright Transfer Form state that the Review of Business Management – RBGN owns, free of charge and permanently, the copyright of the papers it publishes. Although the authors are required to sign the Copyright Transfer Form, RBGN allows authors to hold and use their own copyright without restrictions.
The texts published by RBGN are the sole responsibility of their authors.
The review has adopted the CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allowing redistribution and reuse of papers on condition that the authorship is properly credited.