Palabras clave
gender stereotypes
longitudinal studies
job satisfaction
Europe
Cómo citar
Resumen
Purpose – This paper studies leadership behavior in relation to leader gender, gender congruence, and their relationships with employee job satisfaction over time.
Theoretical framework – Drawing on the perspective of gender stereotypes and the role congruity framework, this study examines how communal stereotypes socially attributed to females can compromise their assessment as competent leaders.
Design/methodology/approach – Two sets of data from the European Working Conditions Survey were studied. Mean comparisons and multivariate regression analyses were carried out on samples of 25,649 at Time 1 and 26,047 at Time 2.
Findings – The main findings show different leadership behaviors between male and female leaders. Contrary to expectations, females displayed more of both instrumental- and relationship-oriented behaviors, and this difference has increased over time. However, fewer differences are observed in instrumental-oriented behaviors. The results also suggest that employees’ gender affects how some leadership behaviors are perceived. Finally, no gender differences were found in job satisfaction, as the behaviors studied positively relate to it.
Practical & social implications of research – From a practical perspective, fostering a diverse array of leadership behaviors is important for enhancing employee job satisfaction within organizations. Female leaders are increasingly viewed positively in the workplace.
Originality/value – Female leaders show a more versatile set of leadership behaviors compared to their male counterparts. Differences in relationship-oriented behaviors persist, and the gender of the employee is important in perceiving which behaviors male or female leaders engage in more.
Citas
Angrist, J. & Pischke, J., (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics. Princeton University Press. United States.
Atwater, L. E., & Waldman, D. A. (2007). Leadership, feedback and the open communication gap. Psychology Press. New York, London.
Brenner, O. C., Tomkiewicz, J., & Schein, V. E. (1989). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics revisited. Academy of management journal, 32(3): 662-669.
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The leadership quarterly, 17(6): 595-616.
Byrne, D., Gouaux, C., Griffitt, W., Lamberth, J., Murakawa, N. B. P. M., Prasad, M., ... & Ramirez III, M. (1971). The ubiquitous relationship: Attitude similarity and attraction: A cross-cultural study. Human Relations, 24(3), 201-207.
Carleton, C. J., & Clain, S. H. (2012). Women, Men, and Job Satisfaction. Eastern Economic Journal, 38: 331–55.
Clark, A. E. (1996). Job Satisfaction in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations 34: 189–217.
Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of public economics, 61(3), 359-381.
Chaturvedi, S., Zyphur, M. J., Arvey, R. D., Avolio, B. J., & Larsson, G. (2012). The heritability of emergent leadership: Age and gender as moderating factors. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(2): 219-232.
Christie-Mizell, C. A. (2006). The effects of traditional family and gender ideology on earnings: Race and gender differences. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(1): 48-71.
Collins, B. J., Burrus, C. J., & Meyer, R. D. (2014). Gender differences in the impact of leadership styles on subordinate embeddedness and job satisfaction. The leadership quarterly, 25(4): 660-671.
Cuadrado, I., García‐Ael, C., & Molero, F. (2015). Gender‐typing of leadership: Evaluations of real and ideal managers. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(2): 236-244.
De Neve, J. E., & Ward, G., 2017. Happiness at work. Saïd Business School, Working-Paper 2017-07.
Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic management journal, 33(9), 1072-1089.
Dumdum, U. R., Lowe, K. B., & Avolio, B. J. (2002). A meta-analysis of transformational and transactional leadership correlates of effectiveness and satisfaction: An update and extension. In Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead. Elsevier Science. New York: pp. 35–66.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003a). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The leadership quarterly, 14(6): 807-834.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003b). Finding gender advantage and disadvantage: Systematic research integration is the solution. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6): 851-859.
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological bulletin, 129(4): 569.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological review, 109(3): 573-598.
Ellemers, N., De Gilder, D., & Haslam, S. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management review, 29(3): 459-478.
European Institute of Gender Equality (2023). Available at https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2023/domain/power. Accessed on April, 10, 2024.
[dataset] Eurofound (2013). Fifth European Working Conditions Survey: Overview report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Eurofound (2013). Fifth European Working Conditions Survey: Methodology. Available at https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/surveys/european-working-conditions-surveys/ewcs-2010/ewcs-2010-methodology. Accessed on April, 19, 2024.
[dataset] Eurofound (2016). Sixth European Working Conditions Survey: Overview report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Eurofound (2016). Sixth European Working Conditions Survey: Methodology. Available at (https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/surveys/european-working-conditions-surveys/ewcs-2015/ewcs-2015-methodology). Accessed on April, 19, 2024.
Eurostat (2013). Job satisfaction statistics. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Satisfaction_with_job,_by_income_tercile,_EU-28,_2013.png. Accessed on April, 19, 2014.
Eurostat (2018). Subjective well-being statistics. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Subjective_well-being_statistics&oldid=462266#Overall_life_satisfaction_in_the_EU. Accessed on April, 19, 2014.
Eurostat (2019). Gender statistics. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Gender_statistics. Accessed on January, 10, 2020.
Fjendbo, T. H., Jacobsen, C. B., & An, S. H. (2022). The importance of similarity: How gender congruence matters for the impact of leadership training. Administration & Society, 54(8), 1542-1571.
Fried, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta‐analysis. Personnel psychology, 40(2): 287-322.
Gardiner, M., & Tiggemann, M. (1999). Gender differences in leadership style, job stress and mental health in male‐and female‐dominated industries. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 72(3): 301-315.
Gardner, W. L., Karam, E. P., Alvesson, M., & Einola, K. (2021). Authentic leadership theory: The case for and against. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), 101495.
Gati, I., & Perez, M. (2014). Gender differences in career preferences from 1990 to 2010: Gaps reduced but not eliminated. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(1): 63.
Glass, C. & Cook, A. (2016), Leading at the top: understanding women’s challenges above the glass ceiling. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1): 51-63.
Graham, J. W. (1991). Servant-leadership in organizations: Inspirational and moral. The Leadership Quarterly, 2(2): 105-119.
Grissom, J. A., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Keiser, L. (2012). Does my boss's gender matter? Explaining job satisfaction and employee turnover in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4): 649-673.
Hackman, J. R. (2002). Why teams don’t work. In Theory and research on small groups. Springer, Boston, MA: pp. 245-267.
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., and Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983–2014. Psychology Women Q, 40, 353–363.
Heilman, M. E. (2012). Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Research in organizational Behavior, 32: 113-135.
Hentschel, T., Braun, S., Peus, C., & Frey, D. (2017). The communality-bonus effect for male transformational leaders -leadership style, gender, and promotability. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 27(1): 112-125.
Hentschel T, Heilman M.E., & Peus C.V. (2019). The Multiple Dimensions of Gender Stereotypes: A Current Look at Men’s and Women’s Characterizations of Others and Themselves. Frontiers of Psychology, 10:11.
Hesketh, A., & Fleetwood, S. (2006). Beyond measuring the human resources management-organizational performance link: Applying critical realist meta-theory. Organization, 13(5), 677-699.
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 5, 103-128.
Hughes, F. M., & Seta, C. E. (2003). Gender stereotypes: Children's perceptions of future compensatory behavior following violations of gender roles. Sex Roles, 49(11-12): 685-691.
Humbert, A. L., Kelan, E., & van den Brink, M. (2019). The perils of gender beliefs for men leaders as change agents for gender equality. European Management Review, 16(4): 1143-1157.
Ioannidou, E., Karagiorgos, T., & Alexandris, K. (2016). Exploring the relationship of organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, psychological empowerment and job satisfaction with Leader-Member Exchange of section leaders and team leaders in summer children’s camps in Greece. International Journal of Sport Management, Recreation and Tourism, 22: 63-80.
Judge, T. A., Colbert, A. E., & Ilies, R. (2004). Intelligence and leadership: a quantitative review and test of theoretical propositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3): 542.
Judge, T. A., Weiss, H. M., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Hulin, C. L. (2017). Job attitudes, job satisfaction, and job affect: A century of continuity and of change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3): 356.
Karelaia, N., & Guillén, L. (2014). Me, a woman and a leader: Positive social identity and identity conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125(2): 204-219.
Koenig, A. M., and Eagly, A. H. (2014). Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: observations of groups’ roles shape stereotypes. Journal of personality and social psychology, 107, 371–392.
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological bulletin, 137(4): 616.
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic leadership development. Positive organizational scholarship: 241, 258.
Mamadou, S. (2019). Are women better leaders than men? Gender differences in management styles. Int J Bus Manag, 5, 50-52.
Matijaš, M., Merkaš, M., & Brdovčak, B. (2018). Job resources and satisfaction across gender: the role of work–family conflict. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(4/5): 372-385.
Mumford, K., & Smith, P. N. (2015). Peer salaries and gender differences in job satisfaction in the workplace. The Manchester School, 83(3): 307-313.
Ni, H. W., & Huo, Y. J. (2018). Same‐gender supervisors protect women's leadership aspirations after negative performance feedback. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(8): 437-447.
Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Walker, L. S., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1129–1145.
Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International journal of intercultural relations, 35(3): 271-280.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Transformational leader behaviors and substitutes for leadership as determinants of employee satisfaction, commitment, trust, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of management, 22(2): 259-298.
Preko, A. (2012). Attitude of male employees toward female managers in selected organizations in Ghana. Researchers World, 3(3): 86.
Rhee, K. S., & Sigler, T. H. (2014). Leading with heart: the impact of emotionally intelligent leadership. In Why Human Capital Is Important for Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London: pp. 62-75.
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2010). The effect of priming gender roles on women’s implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations. Social psychology, 41: 192-202.
Saha, R., Shashi, Cerchione, R., Singh, R., & Dahiya, R. (2020). Effect of ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility on firm performance: A systematic review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 409-429.
Schyns, B., & Croon, M. A. (2006). A model of task demands, social structure, and leader–member exchange and their relationship to job satisfaction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(4): 602-615.
Stoker, J. I., Van der Velde, M., & Lammers, J. (2012). Factors relating to managerial stereotypes: The role of gender of the employee and the manager and management gender ratio. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1): 31-42.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Political psychology (pp. 276-293). Psychology Press.
Tourigny, L., Han, J., & Baba, V. V. (2017). Does gender matter? A study of trust and its outcomes in the manufacturing sector in mainland China. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 32(8): 554-577.
Van Emmerik, H., Wendt, H., & Euwema, M. C. (2010). Gender ratio, societal culture, and male and female leadership. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4): 895-914.
Van Gils, S., Van Quaquebeke, N., Borkowski, J., & van Knippenberg, D. (2018). Respectful leadership: Reducing performance challenges posed by leader role incongruence and gender dissimilarity. Human relations, 71(12): 1590-1610.
Watson, C., & Hoffman, L. R. (2004). The role of task-related behavior in the emergence of leaders: The dilemma of the informed woman. Group & Organization Management, 29(6): 659-685.
Weiss, H. M. (2002). Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences. Human resource management review, 12(2): 173-194.
Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2004). The role of psychological well-being in job performance: a fresh look at an age-old quest. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4): 338-351.
Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Chun, J. U., & Dansereau, F. (2005). Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review. The leadership quarterly, 16(6): 879-919.
Zenger, J. & Folkman, J. (2020). Women are better leaders during a crisis. Harvard Business Review. Available at https://hbr.org/2020/12/research-women-are-better-leaders-during-a-crisis. Accessed on April 23, 2024.
Una vez aprobada la publicación del artículo, el/los autor/es cede/n los derechos de copyright a la Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios – RBGN.
Es OBLIGATORIO que los autores envíen a la RBGN el formulario de Cesión de Derechos de Autor debidamente cumplimentado y firmado según el modelo: [Derechos de autor]
Las condiciones de la Cesión de Derechos de Autor indican que la Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios – RBGN goza a título gratuito y en carácter definitivo de los derechos de autor patrimoniales de los artículos publicados por ella. A pesar de la Cesión de los Derechos de Autor, la RBGN faculta a los autores al uso de estos derechos sin restricciones.
Los autores se responsabilizan de los textos publicados en la RBGN.
La RBGN adopta el modelo de licencia CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0, permitiendo la redistribución y reutilización de los artículos garantizando que la autoría esté debidamente acreditada.