Keywords
earnings persistence
debt
income taxes
How to Cite
Abstract
Purpose – We analyze how debt burden and income taxes affect the earnings quality of Portuguese SMEs, using earnings persistence as a proxy for earnings quality. More specifically, we intend to find out whether the high indebtedness of these firms causes a greater tax effect than debt effect.
Theoretical framework – While credit banks represent the main source of financing for SMEs, they tend to reduce their earnings in order to avoid taxes. However, this activity can be costly for their development, given that banking institutions demand earnings persistence to reduce the risk of default, in accordance with contract theory.
Design/methodology/approach – We collect data for 140 Portuguese SMEs over the period from 2015 to 2021 to run panel data regressions.
Findings – Debt and earnings persistence are negatively related, so this relationship tends to degrade earnings quality, which is inconsistent with capturing bank confidence. Furthermore, debt maintains the negative effect with income taxes in the model. However, in this combination, income taxes become significant to explain the negative influence on earnings persistence, which is consistent with tax avoidance. Finally, we control for firm size, which is positively associated with earnings persistence. Overall, taking together the determinants of debt, income tax and size, Portuguese SMEs do not have persistent earnings.
Originality/value – In the most leveraged Portuguese SMEs, debt is not a governance mechanism to control managers’ decisions, as more debt reduces earnings persistence, meaning that managers are not sensitive to capturing creditors’ confidence. In addition, the tax effect is more relevant than the debt effect for earnings persistence. Faced with interest rate rigidity, managers exploit the discretionary nature of tax decisions.
Keywords – SMEs; earnings persistence; debt; income taxes.
References
ANDRÉ, P., FILIP, A., & PAUGAM, L. (2015). The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on conditional conservatism in Europe. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 42(3-4), 482-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12105.
BALL, R. (2006). International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and cons for investors. Accounting and Business Research, 36(Suppl 1), 5-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730040.
BARTOV, E., GIVOLY, D., & HAYN, C. (2002). The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(2), 173-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00045-9
BLAYLOCK, B., SHEVLIN, T., & WILSON, R. (2012). Tax avoidance, large positive temporary book-tax differences, and earnings persistence. The Accounting Review, 87(1), 91-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-10158.
BRADSHAW, M., BUSHEE, B., & MILLER, G. (2004). Accounting choice, home bias, and U.S. investment in non-U.S. firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(5), 795-841.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00157.x.
CERQUEIRA, A. M., & PEREIRA, C. F. (2019). Earnings management and stock market reaction. In J. S. Oliveira, G. M. C. Azevedo & A. C. S. Ferreira (Eds.), International financial reporting standards and new directions in earnings management (pp. 32-52). IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7817-8.ch002.
CERQUEIRA, A. M., & PEREIRA, C. F. (2020). The effect of economic conditions on accounting conservatism under IFRS in Europe. Review of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 137-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2020-0007.
DEANGELO, L. E. (1986). Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes: A study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review, 61(3), 400-420.
DECHOW, P. (1994). Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18(1), 3-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)90016-7
DECHOW, P., & SCHRAND, C. (2004). Earnings quality. Research Foundation of CFA Institute Charlottesville.
DECHOW, P., GE, W., & SCHRAND, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 344-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001.
DEFOND, M. L., & JIAMBALVO, J. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(1-2), 145-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)90008-6
DEMERJIAN, P., LEV, B., LEWIS, M., & MCVAY, S. (2013). Managerial ability and earnings quality. The Accounting Review, 88(2), 463-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr-50318.
DICHEV, I. D., GRAHAM, J. R., HARVEY, C. R., & RAJGOPAL, S. (2013). Earnings quality: Evidence from the field. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2-3), 1-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.05.004.
DIMITROPOULOS, P. E., ASTERIOU, D., KOUSENIDIS, D., & LEVENTIS, S. (2013). The impact of IFRS on accounting quality: Evidence from Greece. Advances in Accounting, 29(1), 108-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2013.03.004.
DYRENG, S., HILLEGEIST, S., & PENALVA, F. (2022). Earnings management to avoid debt covenant violations and future performance. European Accounting Review, 31(2), 311-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2020.1826337.
EWERT, R., & WAGENHOFER, A. (2015). Economic relations among earnings quality measures. Abacus, 51(3), 311-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/abac.12054.
FIELDS, T. D., LYS, T. Z., & VINCENT, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 255-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3.
FRANCIS, J., LAFOND, R., OLSSON, P. M., & SCHIPPER, K. (2004). Costs of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 967-1010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.967.
HANLON, M. (2005). The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flows when firms have large book‐tax differences. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 137-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.137.
HEALY, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3), 85-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1.
HEALY, P. M., & WAHLEN, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365.
JENSEN, M. C., & MECKLING, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X.
JONES, J. J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2), 193-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2491047.
KARJALAINEN, J., KASANEN, E., KINNUNEN, J., & NISKANEN, J. (2023). Dividends and tax avoidance as drivers of earnings management: Evidence from dividend-paying private SMEs in Finland. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(2), 906-937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2020.1824526.
KHUONG, N. V., RAHMAN, A. A. A., THUAN, P.Q., LIEM, N. T., ANH, L. H. T., THUY, C. T. M., & LY, H. T. N. (2022). Earnings management, board composition and earnings persistence in emerging market. Sustainability, 14(3), 1061-1076. http://dx.doi.
org/10.3390/su14031061.
KVAAL, E., & NOBES, C. (2010). International differences in IFRS policy choice: A research note. Accounting and Business Research, 40(2), 173-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2010.9663390.
MULFORD, C. W., & COMISKEY, E. E. (2005). The financial numbers game: Detecting creative accounting practices. John Wiley & Sons.
NOBES, C., & PARKER, R. B. (2008). Comparative international accounting. Pearson Education.
PALUMBO, R., & ROSATI, P. (2022). Exploring the relationship between new bank debt and earnings management: Evidence from Italian SMEs. Economies, 10(6), 124. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/economies10060124.
PENMAN, S. H., & ZHANG, X. (2002). Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 237-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.2.237.
PEREIRA, A., PEREIRA, C., GOMES, L., & LIMA, A. (2023). Do taxes still affect earning persistence? Administrative Sciences, 13(2), 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/admsci13020048.
SAKA, C., OSHIKA, T., & JIMICHI, M. (2019). Visualization of tax avoidance and tax rate convergence: Exploratory analysis of world-scale accounting data. Meditari Accountancy Research, 27(5), 695-724.http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2018-0298.
SCHIPPER, K., & VINCENT, L. (2003). Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons, 17(s-1), 97-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.s-1.97.
SCOTT, W. R. (1997). Financial accounting theory (Vol. 343). Prentice Hall.
SLOAN, R. G. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? The Accounting Review, 71(3), 289-315.
SOUSA, A., GÓIS, C. G., & VISEU, C. (2019). Earnings management in SMEs: Evidence from Portugal
and Spain. In J. S. Oliveira, G. M. C. Azevedo & A. C. S. Ferreira (Eds.), International financial reporting standards and new directions in earnings management (pp. 101-126). IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7817-8.ch005.
SWEENEY, A. P. (1994). Debt-covenant violations and managers’ accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17(3), 281-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(94)90030-2.
WATTS, R. L., & ZIMMERMAN, J. L. (1978). Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 53(1), 112-134.
If a paper is approved for publication, its copyright has to be transferred by the author(s) to the Review of Business Management – RBGN.
Accordingly, authors are REQUIRED to send RBGN a duly completed and signed Copyright Transfer Form. Please refer to the following template: [Copyright Transfer]
The conditions set out by the Copyright Transfer Form state that the Review of Business Management – RBGN owns, free of charge and permanently, the copyright of the papers it publishes. Although the authors are required to sign the Copyright Transfer Form, RBGN allows authors to hold and use their own copyright without restrictions.
The texts published by RBGN are the sole responsibility of their authors.
The review has adopted the CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allowing redistribution and reuse of papers on condition that the authorship is properly credited.