Keywords
consumption embodiment
performativity
ethnography
Foucauldian genealogy
How to Cite
Abstract
Purpose – The aim of the current study is to investigate how consumer performativity is enacted through embodiment transformation, based on the theoretical elaboration of the body in three dimensions, namely: resistance, utopia and desire.
Theoretical framework – Based on previous literature, the study proposes a theoretical framework when embodiment transformations – i.e., politics, pleasures, and affects – overlap through consumer performativity, evoking Foucauldian concepts to understand the dispositif sustained in a consumption ethos.
Design/methodology/approach – The study was conducted by investigating the cosplay practice based on the use of an ethnographic Foucauldian genealogy.
Findings – The results evidenced three consumption embodiments based on dispositifs circumscribed amidst pairs of body dimensions: redemption, related to politics; reward, regarding pleasure; and rapport, about affection.
Practical & social implications of research – Presumably, these representations are evidence of an attempt to improve the body that represents the best way to experience this consumption ethos, which is herein called the “avatar of the self”: a governing meta-body used to mediate consumption experiences through performativities.
Originality/value – Avatar of the self is an interpretation of the theoretical generalization of phenomena of consumption embodiment through performativities.
References
Arnould, E. J., Thompson, C. J., & Press, M. (2020). Consumer culture theory: an anthropological contribution to consumption studies. In R. Mir & A.-L. Fayard (Eds.), The routledge companion to anthropology and business (pp. 118-131).
Routledge. Arnould, E., & Thompson, C. J. (2015). Introduction: Consumer culture theory: Ten years gone (and beyond). Consumer culture theory (Research in Consumer Behavior), 17(1), 1-21.
Belk, R. W., Ger, G., & Askegaard, S. (2003). The fire of desire: A multisited inquiry into consumer passion. The Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 326-351. http://doi. org/10.1086/378613.
Bode, M., & Kjeldgaard, D. (2017). Brand doings in a performative perspective: An analysis of conceptual brand discourses. In J. F. Sherry & E. M. Fischer (Eds.), Contemporary consumer culture theory (pp. 251-282). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315563947-14.
Bokek-Cohen, Y. A. (2016). How are marketing strategies of genetic material used as a mechanism for biopolitical governmentality? Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(6), 534-554. http://doi.org/10.1080/1025 3866.2015.1137897.
Brownlie, D., Hewer, P., & Tadajewski, M. (2009). Thinking “Communities of Academic Practice”: On space, enterprise and governance in marketing academia. Journal of Marketing Management, 25(7-8), 635-642. http://doi. org/10.1362/026725709X471532.
Carrington, M. J., & Ozanne, J. L. (2022). Becoming through contiguity and lines of flight: The four faces of celebrity-proximate assemblages. The Journal of Consumer Research, 48(5), 858-884. http://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucab026.
Cluley, R., & Brown, S. D. (2015). The dividualised consumer: Sketching the new mask of the consumer. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(1-2), 107-122. http://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.958518. Cristofari, C., & Guitton, M. J. (2017). Aca-fans and fan communities: An operative framework. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(3), 713-731. http://doi. org/10.1177/1469540515623608.
Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. University of Minnesota Press.
Denegri-Knott, J., & Tadajewski, M. (2017). Sanctioning value: The legal system, hyper-power and the legitimation of MP3. Marketing Theory, 17(2), 219-240. http://doi. org/10.1177/1470593116677766. Denegri-Knott, J., Nixon, E., & Abraham, K. (2018). Politicising the study of sustainable living practices. Consumption Markets & Culture, 21(6), 554-573. http:// doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2017.1414048.
Dion, D., & Arnould, E. (2016). Persona-fied brands: Managing branded persons through persona. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(1-2), 121-148. http://doi.or g/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1096818.
El Jurdi, H., Moufahim, M., & Dekel, O. (2022). They said we ruined the character and our religion”: Authenticity and legitimation of hijab cosplay. Qualitative Market Research, 25(1), 43-59. http://doi.org/10.1108/QMR01-2021-0014.
Foucault, M. (1971). Orders of discourse. Social Sciences Information. Information Sur les Sciences Sociales, 10(2), 7-30. http://doi.org/10.1177/053901847101000201.
Foucault, M. (2002). The archaeology of knowledge.
Routledge.Foucault, M. (2006a). Utopian body. In C. A. Jones (Ed.), Sensorium: Embodied experience, technology, and contemporary art (pp. 229-234).
MIT Press Foucault, M. (2006b). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1: The Will to Knowledge).
Penguin. Gn, J. (2011). Queer simulation: The practice, performance and pleasure of cosplay. Continuum (Perth), 25(4), 583-593. http://doi.org/10.1080/103 04312.2011.582937.
Harju, A. A., & Huovinen, A. (2015). Fashionably voluptuous: Normative femininity and resistant performative tactics in fatshion blogs. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(15-16), 1602-1625. http://doi.org/10.1080/026725 7X.2015.1066837.
Hein, W., & O’Donohoe, S. (2014). Practising gender: The role of banter in young men’s improvisations of masculine consumer identities. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(13-14), 1293-1319. http://doi.org/10 .1080/0267257X.2013.852608.
Hill, T., & McDonagh, P. (2020). The dark side of marketing communications: Critical marketing perspectives. Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780429504150.
Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: Modes, varieties, affordances. In N. Fielding, R. M. Lee & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of online research methods (pp. 257-270). SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi. org/10.4135/9780857020055.
Holt, D. B. (2017). Consumer Culture Strategy. In J. F. Sherry Jr. & E. Fischer (Eds.), Contemporary consumer culture theory (pp. 215-224). Routledge. http://doi. org/10.4324/9781315563947-12.
Hong, S., & Vicdan, H. (2016). Re-imagining the utopian: Transformation of a sustainable lifestyle in ecovillages. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 120-136. http://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.026. Jacobsen, M. H., & Hansen, A. R. (2021). (Re) introducing embodied practical understanding to the sociology of sustainable consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21(4), 747-763. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540519846213.
Joubert, A. M., & Coffin, J. (2020). Four fanatical friends and other alliterative allegories. Marketing Theory, 20(2), 195-201. http://doi.org/10.1177/1470593119897760.
Joy, A., Belk, R., & Bhardwaj, R. (2015). Judith Butler on performativity and precarity: Exploratory thoughts on gender and violence in India. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(15-16), 1739-1745. http://doi.org/10 .1080/0267257X.2015.1076873.
Kapoor, V., Patterson, M., & O’Malley, L. (2020). Liminal consumption of “the cosmic ballet”: An autoethnography. Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(1), 61-80. http://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1494593.
Kendall, G., & Wickham, G. (1999). Using Foucault’s methods. Sage. http://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020239.
Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61-72. http:// doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935.
Kozinets, R. V. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research. Sage.
Kozinets, R. V., & Jenkins, H. (2022). Consumer movements, brand activism, and the participatory politics of media: A conversation. Journal of Consumer Culture, 22(1), 264-282. http://doi.org/10.1177/14695405211013993.
Kozinets, R. V., Scaraboto, D., & Parmentier, M. A. (2018). Evolving netnography: How brand auto-netnography, a netnographic sensibility, and more-than-human netnography can transform your research. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(3-4), 231-242. http://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2018.1446488.
Kozinets, R., Patterson, A., & Ashman, R. (2017). Networks of desire: How technology increases our passion to consume. The Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 659-682. http://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw061.
Lamerichs, N. (2013). The cultural dynamic of doujinshi and cosplay: Local anime fandom in Japan, USA and Europe. Participations, 10(1), 154-176.
Leban, M., Thomsen, T. U., von Wallpach, S., & Voyer, B. G. (2021). Constructing personas: How high-networth social media influencers reconcile ethicality and living a luxury lifestyle. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(2), 225-239. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04485-6.
Mello, R. R., Almeida, S. O., & Dalmoro, M. (2021). The emperor’s new cosplay: The agency of an absent material on the consumption experience. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(3), 241-261. http://doi.org/10.1 080/10253866.2020.1756268.
Min, H. J., & Peñaloza, L. (2019). The agentic body in immigrant maternal identity reconstruction: Embodiment, consumption, acculturation. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(3), 272-296. http://doi.org/10.1080/1025 3866.2018.1494590.
Minowa, Y., Visconti, L. M., & Maclaran, P. (2012). Researchers’ introspection for multi-sited ethnographers: A xenoheteroglossic autoethnography. Journal of Business Research, 65(4), 483-489. http://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2011.02.026.
Moura, B. M., de Souza-Leão, A. L. M., Silva, E. P. D., & Santos, G. M. A. D. (2023). Just one screen is not enough: Social TV role to Brazilian fans of Major League Soccer. Sport, Business and Management, 13(3), 326-353. http://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-06-2021-0068.
Murphy, S. (2022). He’s got the touch’: Tracing the masculine regulation of the body schema in reciprocal relations between ‘self-others-things. Marketing Theory, 22(1), 21-40. http://doi.org/10.1177/14705931211035172.
Murray, J. B., & Ozanne, J. L. (1991). The critical imagination: Emancipatory interests in consumer research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 129-144. http:// doi.org/10.1086/209247.
O’Leary, K., & Murphy, S. (2019). Moving beyond Goffman: The performativity of anonymity on SNS. European Journal of Marketing, 53(1), 83-107. http:// doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2017-0016.
Paltrinieri, L. (2012). Lexpérience du concept: Michel Foucault entre épistémologie et histoire. Éditions de la Sorbonne.
Rokka, J., & Canniford, R. (2016). Heterotopian selfies: How social media destabilizes brand assemblages. European Journal of Marketing, 50(9/10), 1789-1813. http://doi. org/10.1108/EJM-08-2015-0517.
Roux, D. (2014). Revisiting (not so) commonplace ideas about the body: Topia, utopia and heterotopia in the world of tattooing. In Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Consumer culture theory (Research in Consumer Behavior, Vol. 16, pp. 59-80). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0885-211120140000016003.
Roux, D., & Belk, R. (2019). The body as (another) place: Producing embodied heterotopias through tattooing. The Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 483-507. http://doi. org/10.1093/jcr/ucy081.
Schembri, S., & Latimer, L. (2016). Online brand communities: Constructing and co-constructing brand culture. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(7-8), 628- 651. http://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1117518.
Schöps, J. D., Kogler, S., & Hemetsberger, A. (2020). (De-) stabilizing the digitized fashion market on Instagram– dynamics of visual performative assemblages. Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(2), 195-213. http://doi.org/10.1 080/10253866.2019.1657099.
Schroeder, J. E., & Zwick, D. (2004). Mirrors of masculinity: Representation and identity in advertising images. Consumption Markets & Culture, 7(1), 21-52. http://doi.org/10.1080/1025386042000212383.
Seregina, A. (2020). Undoing gender through performing the other. In E. Tissier-Desbordes & L. M. Visconti (Eds.), Gender after gender in consumer culture (pp. 148-167). Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781003125501-8.
Seregina, A., & Weijo, H. A. (2017). Play at any cost: How cosplayers produce and sustain their ludic communal consumption experiences. The Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 139-159.
Souza-Leão, A. L. M. D., Ferreira, B. R. T., & Moura, B. M. (2022). Commitment to freedom: A fannish struggle for the representativeness of political identities. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 24(4), 638-654. http:// doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v24i4.4202.
Tadajewski, M. (2011). Producing historical critical marketing studies: Theory, method and politics. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 3(4), 549-575. http:// doi.org/10.1108/17557501111183662.
Thompson, C. J. (2017). Canonical authors in consumption theory. In S. Askegaard & B. Heilbrunn (Eds.), Producing foucaldians: Consumer culture theory and the analytics of power (pp. 212-220).
Routledge. Thompson, C. J. (2019). The ‘big data’ myth and the pitfalls of ‘thick data’ opportunism: On the need for a different ontology of markets and consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(3-4), 207-230. http://doi. org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1579751.
Thompson, C. J., & Üstüner, T. (2015). Women skating on the edge: Marketplace performances as ideological edgework. The Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 235- 265. http://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv013.
Viotto, M. H., Zanette, M. C., & Brito, E. P. Z. (2021). Looking good or feeling good? The dual role of the body in the taste transformation process. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(1), 54-74. http://doi.org/10.1080/10253 866.2020.1726329.
Visconti, L. M. (2016). A conversational approach to consumer vulnerability: Performativity, representations, and storytelling. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(3-4), 371-385. http://doi.org/10.1080/026725 7X.2015.1122660.
Winter, R. (2023). Struggle over control: Sound in home video. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 26(1), 120-136. http://doi.org/10.1177/13678779221135057. PMid:36568728.
Woermann, N. (2018). Focusing ethnography: Theory and recommendations for effectively combining video and ethnographic research. Journal of Marketing Management, 34(5-6), 459-483. http://doi.org/10.1080/026725 7X.2018.1441174.
Yngfalk, C. (2016). Bio-politicizing consumption: Neo-liberal consumerism and disembodiment in the food marketplace. Consumption Markets & Culture, 19(3), 275-295. http://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2 015.1102725.
Zanette, M. C., & Brito, E. P. Z. (2019). Fashionable subjects and complicity resistance: Power, subjectification, and bounded resistance in the context of plus-size consumers. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(4), 363-382. http:// doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1512241.
If a paper is approved for publication, its copyright has to be transferred by the author(s) to the Review of Business Management – RBGN.
Accordingly, authors are REQUIRED to send RBGN a duly completed and signed Copyright Transfer Form. Please refer to the following template: [Copyright Transfer]
The conditions set out by the Copyright Transfer Form state that the Review of Business Management – RBGN owns, free of charge and permanently, the copyright of the papers it publishes. Although the authors are required to sign the Copyright Transfer Form, RBGN allows authors to hold and use their own copyright without restrictions.
The texts published by RBGN are the sole responsibility of their authors.
The review has adopted the CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 allowing redistribution and reuse of papers on condition that the authorship is properly credited.